Illustrative image for What Really Causes Autism and What We Should Do About It

Bioethics Forum Essay

What Really Causes Autism and What We Should Do About It

I recently met Billy, a 12-year-old boy with severe autism.  He had been growing well but, at around age 3, he became increasingly delayed in speaking and walking.  As he got older, he would frequently scream unconsolably when upset. and have temper tantrums and meltdowns, spilling and throwing food all around him, and difficulty understanding spoken language or learning. Eventually, testing showed that he had an IQ of 70—in the category of intellectual disability.  

To determine the cause of his difficulties, his parents entered a study, through which I met him. As part of the study Billy and his parents underwent genetic testing, which revealed that he had a new, or “de novo,” mutation that neither of his parents possessed, an error in the “cutting and pasting” of his DNA.  As an embryo rapidly copies DNA, creating billions of cells to form an infant, mistakes occasionally get made.  We each have about 1,000 such errors.  The vast majority have no effect.  But sometimes they do, causing various conditions, including autism.  About 20% of autism cases, including Billy’s, result from a de novo genetic variation. 

Recently, given Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s attacks on vaccines as the cause of autism, I have been thinking about Billy.  Kennedy’s assaults, dissuading Americans from getting immunizations, are already causing outbreaks of measles and will soon likely spread otherwise preventable diseases, including polio and influenza, potentially killing thousands of Americans. 

His critics have focused on why he shouldn’t attack vaccines, but crucial questions also arise about what does in fact cause autism and how to prevent and address it.

Autism spectrum disorder affects 1 in 31 eight-year-olds in the United States, and has been increasing for reasons that are not entirely clear.  The theory that vaccines cause autism has, in fact, long been  disproven.  The only study that purported to support this theory was completely fabricated—the author claimed that 50% of children developed autism after getting vaccines, when in fact none of these children did so.

Instead, autism has been rising in large part due to better detection and expanded criteria for diagnosing it.  Diagnosis also varies among socioeconomic groups (ranging from 1 in 103 in certain areas in Texas to around 1 in 19  in California), with much higher prevalence  in wealthy than in poor families, and in white  than Black families. There is no reason to think, however, that wealthy white people in fact are more likely to have autism than poorer Black individuals.  Instead, the rates vary due to different rates of screening and detection.  We are also now defining the condition far more broadly.  Millions of children who had previously been diagnosed with intellectual disabilities are now considered autistic as well.

Environmental factors also play roles, including a mother’s obesity, older age, diabetes caused by pregnancy, polycystic ovary syndrome, and exposures to various pesticides and infections. Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (or “ICSI”), used as part of in-vitro fertilization, injects sperm directly into eggs to increase the odds of fertilization. It was developed and intended for use with men with low sperm counts, but it is now used in most IVF.  It turns out to double the rate of intellectual disabilities and autism in the offspring.

Some autistic people argue that the cause does not matter, and that we instead just need greater acceptance.  Unfortunately, society commonly stigmatizes autistic people, failing to accommodate them, impeding these individuals’ optimal functioning.  Certainly, we should shift social attitudes and better accommodate neurodiverse people.

Yet knowledge that the cause of a child’s autism is genetic has helped countless people.  Billy’s parents and many others found that learning the reason for their child’s symptoms  reduced their guilt.  Billy’s mother had feared that maybe the glass of wine she drank before she knew she was pregnant was the trigger.

Billy’s parents had been afraid to have another child because of the risk of autism.  But the fact that Billy’s autism  was a  chance occurrence convinced them that they could have another child, if they wanted, and that the  risk of the condition would not be elevated.

Genetic variations have not been identified for all autistic people—the science is still new. But the fact that numerous people have them should encourage us to continue to fund research seeking the causes, and potential medical or psychosocial interventions and services for people who may want them.

Unfortunately, while the Trump administration, through Kennedy, seeks to reduce autism with attacks on vaccines and intentions to reduce certain ingredients in food, the administration is also eliminating vital research at the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institutes of Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to discover the actual causes of autism and how to address them.

If our goal is indeed to decrease suffering from autism, we need to rely on facts, not assumptions and ideologies, and heighten efforts in schools and clinics to identify autistic children, especially those who are poorer and not white, to provide appropriate services for them.  Yet, the Trump administration has gutted the Department of Education, which could lead, coordinate, and oversee such programs.

We should restore support for vaccines but also fund essential research to develop educational programs for schools and healthcare providers to enhance autism diagnosis, acceptance, accommodation, and services. Kennedy’s focus on vaccines will not only spread fatal infectious diseases but will also deprive countless autistic people and their families of what they need.

Robert Klitzman, MD, is a professor of psychiatry at the Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, and director of the online and in-person Bioethics Masters and Certificate Programs at Columbia University, and a Hastings Center Fellow. He is the author of Doctor, Will You Pray for Me?:  Medicine, Chaplains and Healing the Whole Person@Robertklitzman @RobertKlitzman.bsky.social LinkedIn Robert-Klitzman

Read More Like This

Hastings Bioethics Forum essays are the opinions of the authors, not of The Hastings Center.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *