IRB: Ethics & Human Research

IRB Chairs’ Perspectives on Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment

Recruiting research participants based on genetic information generated about them in a prior study is a potentially powerful way to study the functional significance of human genetic variation, but it also presents ethical challenges. To inform policy development on this issue, we conducted a survey of U.S. institutional review board chairs concerning the acceptability of recontacting genetic research participants about additional research and their views on the disclosure of individual genetic results as part of recruitment. Our findings suggest there is unlikely to be a “one-size-fits-all” solution, but rather several ethically acceptable approaches to genotype-driven recruitment, depending on context. Disclosures made during the consent process for the original study and the clinical validity of the results are key considerations. Researchers must be prepared to communicate and answer questions in clear lay language about what is known and not known regarding the role of genetics in their proposed area of research.

Key words/concepts: research recruitment, informed consent, disclosure of research results, genetic research, institutional review boards

Laura M. Beskow, Emily E. Namey, Patrick R. Miller, Daniel K. Nelson, and Alexandra Cooper, “IRB Chairs’ Perspectives on Genotype-Driven Research Recruitment,” IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34, no. 3 (2012): 1-10.

The Hastings Center has never shied away from the toughest ethical challenges faced by society.

LET US SHARE OUR EXPERIENCES WITH YOU

Interests

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.