Spring Appeal: COVID-19 raises urgent ethical issues for each of us. Our experts shape real-time responses.
  • IRB: ETHICS & HUMAN RESEARCH

Consent for Future Genetic Research: The NHANES Experience in 2007–2008

We analyzed the characteristics of consenting individuals participating in the 2007–2008 data cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative survey of the U.S. population, to determine consent rates for nongenetic future research and genetic research. During this period, the consent rate for genetic research was 86%, whereas the consent rate for nongenetic research was 99.3% and never dropped below 98.2%. The overall consent rates for nongenetic and genetic research reveal that a significant majority of individuals agreed to provide biospecimens for future unspecified research—including genetic studies. However, consent rates for genetic research were lower for certain groups: for non-Hispanic black participants and those in the “other” racial/ethnic category compared with the rate for non-Hispanic whites; for younger participants (20–39) compared with older ones; and for individuals interviewed in English compared with those interviewed in Spanish.

Key words/concepts: human subjects research, informed consent to research, genetic research, storage of biospecimens, biobanking

Geraldine M. McQuillan and Kathryn S. Porter, “Consent for Future Genetic Research: The NHANES Experience in 2007–2008,” IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33, no. 1 (2011): 9-14.

The Hastings Center has never shied away from the toughest ethical challenges faced by society.

LET US SHARE OUR EXPERIENCES WITH YOU

Interests
The Hastings Center has never shied away from the toughest ethical challenges faced by society.

LET US SHARE OUR EXPERIENCES WITH YOU!

Interests