The Role of Values in Impact Assessment
Principal Investigator: Gregory Kaebnick
Funder: National Science Foundation
There is near-universal agreement that the development and application of potentially powerful emerging technologies should be grounded on a thoughtful evaluation of the benefits and harms that the technology might generate. There is considerable disagreement and confusion, however, about how a thoughtful evaluation should be undertaken. In particular, it is not clear what the role of values is in the evaluation of an emerging technology. Risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis are sometimes represented as being objective, even “value free.” But they are also sometimes viewed as supporting special interests under the cloak of “objectivity”; in particular, they are sometimes seen as exemplifying a “proactionary” orientation that favors science and industry.
This project is articulating and examining the role of values in formal impact assessment mechanisms, particularly in cost-benefit analysis and risk assessment for calculating the risks and benefits of emerging technologies. It is asking whether values can or should be eliminated from these mechanisms, and if not, whether we can clarify what the appropriate values are and the role they should play in the analysis. The method in the project is to apply these mechanisms to well-defined cases in synthetic biology, drawing on a team of experts to help carry out and evaluate the application.
The project is intended to improve the understanding and use of impact assessment mechanisms, advance scholarly debates about the precautionary principle and related topics, and facilitate policy-making (and public understanding of it) on synthetic biology. Collectively, these goals contribute to the growing effort to develop strategies that ensure the governance of emerging technologies aligns appropriately with the public’s values.