- BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
Health, Money, and Fear: A Documentary
Published on: May 9, 2008
Published in: Health Care Reform & Policy, Media
Click here for a deeper conversation on this topic led by Hastings Director of Research Josephine Johnston.
A few months ago, I got a call from Dr. Paul Hochfeld, who told me he was an emergency room physician from Corvallis, Oregon, and he had a request. Could he come to The Hastings Center to interview as part of a documentary on health care he planned to make? I was curious to know who was financing the film and where it would appear. He said he was financing it with his own money and the help of a few friends, and he didn’t yet have a distributor.
I could hardly turn down someone with that kind of motivation. He came, interviewed me, asked me to suggest other names, and – remarkably enough – got some of the finest minds in American health care, among them Arnold S. Relman, Marcia Angell, and Stephanie Woolhandler. The film is now finished, and it is terrific.
The main theme of the documentary is health care costs. I have come to think the issue of cost control is just as important, even more important, than universal care, but it gets less attention, makes politicians more nervous and even more fuzzy than usual, and is one of the main reasons the number of uninsured is increasing. The film is built around some basic questions about costs, and it proceeds in a masterly was to answer them. Those interviewed come from a variety of medical and health policy backgrounds, and their comments are skillfully woven together. I find it hard to argue against his view that our system is focused more on money than on health and is driven largely by fear.
Dr. Hochfeld is now trying to find a distributor, ideally a public broadcasting station. I have a son who is a movie director, and I have seen him struggle to get his films distributed. I can readily empathize with anyone going through that wrenching process. It is exceedingly hard, for documentaries as well as for movies. Dr. Hochfeld’s documentary is as good as any I have ever seen, including some made during the Clinton era in the mid-90s, when (for the nth time) a reform effort was under way.
For readers of this space, however, there is some good news. Dr. Hochfeld is willing to send a copy of the film on DVD to anyone who writes to him. The offer is not to be passed up, particularly for readers who might use it in a class or discussion group or maybe even tout it to a local PBS station. He can be reached at: phochfeld@msn.com. More information and a trailer can be found at www.ourailinghealthcare.com.
Readers respond
Published on: May 9, 2008
Published in: Health Care Reform & Policy, Media
The opinions expressed here are those of the authors, not The Hastings Center.
This year, The Hastings Center will celebrate its 50th anniversary. The Center was first located on the second floor of my house in Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y., with some overflow paperwork stored at the home of my neighborhood friend and cofounder, Willard Gaylin. Neither of us had ever run an organization or raised money. I am a… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
A preliminary investigation by Guangdong Province in China of He Jiankui, the scientist who created the world’s first gene-edited babies, found that “He had intentionally dodged supervision, raised funds and organized researchers on his own to carry out the human embryo gene-editing intended for reproduction, which is explicitly banned by relevant regulations.” As bioethics scholars… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
Despite the appearance of agreement, scientists are not of the same mind about the ethics and governance of human germline editing. A careful review of public comments and published commentaries in top-tier science journals reveals marked differences in perspective. These divergences have significant implications for research practice and policy concerning heritable human genome editing. The… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
The introduction of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as a means of preventing HIV infections in those at high risk marked a significant step in the fight against the virus. PrEP involves taking the HIV medicine Truvada or a generic version daily. It is now gradually becoming available across the world, particularly for men who have sex… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
In their single-minded venture of “producing” (shengchan, in their own word) the world’s first gene-edited babies, He Jiankui and his associates have posed numerous and daunting ethical challenges to China and the world. They can be mapped or identified through these four categories: typical problems related to research ethics; broader political, socio-cultural, and transcultural issues;… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
The National Rifle Association recently condemned doctors who are against gun violence, telling us to stay in our lane. Reducing preventable deaths is the main lane for doctors. And despite thinking that doctors would not be targeted because we are here to help, we are not immune. The tragic shooting at Mercy Hospital in Chicago… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
In the wake of the recent Twitter fight between the National Rifle Association and U.S. physician groups over whether doctors should speak out about firearm policy issues, we argue that professionalism actually requires that doctors take a leadership role in gun policy debates, even if (in fact, especially if) doing so is politically fraught and… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
When the world’s first research on editing the genes of human embryos by Chinese scientists was published in an international journal in 2015, a report in the New York Times characterised the key issue involved as “a scientific ethical divide between China and West.” Earlier this year, an article in the magazine Foreign Policy by… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
In response to news of the world’s first babies born in China from gene-edited embryos, Sam Sternberg, a CRISPR/Cas9 researcher at Columbia University, spoke for many when he said “I’ve long suspected that scientists, somewhere, would rush to claim the ‘prize’ of being first to apply CRISPR clinically to edit the DNA of human embryos,… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
The global scientific community has been unanimous in condemning Chinese scientist He Jiankui, who announced last week that he used the gene-editing technology called CRISPR to make permanent, heritable changes to the genes of two baby girls who were born this month in China. Criticism has focused on Dr. He’s violation of worldwide acknowledgement that… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
The birth of gene-edited twin girls was announced by a young Chinese scientist He Jiankui through one of four self-made promotional videos in English on YouTube (a website officially banned in China) on November 25. Three days later, at the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing held in Hong Kong, He revealed that another… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
I started writing this on my way back to New York from the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing, held in Hong Kong November 27 to 29, where the breaking news of the alleged world’s first birth of genetically edited babies loomed large. The surprising news both reinforced and undercut the summit’s goal to… Read more
BIOETHICS FORUM ESSAY
I would like to thank Dan for plugging my video. To elaborate on his kind comments, I would say my audience is the educated voter. My goal is to motivate them to contact, inform, and pressure their elected representatives in Washington. Surprisingly, our Lawmakers would actually rather hear from us than from the lobbyists. To succeed, we must make more noise than those full-time professionals, employed by those who profit from status quo. My target is the political process which is the barrier to substantive reform. I think there are many of us who share the vision of a health care system that is more about health and less about money and fear.
– Paul Hochfeld
www.ourailinghealthcare.com