The ethical case for changing the way we treat
nonhuman animals is gaining ground. Two federal policy developments last year
are evidence that U.S.
officials are responding to arguments for elevating the moral and legal status
of certain species: chimpanzees, gorillas, and other great apes. The policy
actions show that society is beginning to see these species, our closest
nonhuman relatives, as less like property and more like beings entitled to
respect and protection. One significant development is a congressional bill
called the Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act of 2011. A second is the
decision in late 2011 by National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins
to support an Institute
of Medicine committee
report that labeled nearly all of the existing uses of chimpanzees in
biomedical and behavioral research “unnecessary.”
The ethical case for changing the way we treat
nonhuman animals is gaining ground. Two federal policy developments last year
are evidence that U.S.
officials are responding to arguments for elevating the moral and legal status
of certain species: chimpanzees, gorillas, and other great apes. The policy
actions show that society is beginning to see these species, our closest
nonhuman relatives, as less like property and more like beings entitled to
respect and protection. One significant development is a congressional bill
called the Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act of 2011. A second is the
decision in late 2011 by National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins
to support an Institute
of Medicine committee
report that labeled nearly all of the existing uses of chimpanzees in
biomedical and behavioral research “unnecessary.”