
Bioethics Briefs: Doping in Sports
Thomas H. Murray, president of The Hastings Center, argues that, while the task is difficult, sports need to draw a line between accepted performance enhancing technologies and forms of doping that should be banned.
American Association for the Advancement of Science, Good, Better, Best: The Human Quest for Enhancement
Sarah Glazer, Enhancement: A Cross Section of Contemporary Ethical Debate About Altering the Human Body (Garrison, NY: The Hastings Center, 2006).
Additional Readings
Lori P. Knowles and Gregory E. Kaebnick (eds.), Reprogenetics: Law, Policy, and Ethical Issues (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).
N. Agar, Humanity’s End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement(MIT Press, 2010)
N. Agar, Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement (Blackwell, 2004)
A. Buchanan et al., From Chance to Choice: Genetics & Justice (Cambridge University Press, 2000)
C. Elliot, Better than Well (New York: Norton, 2004)
J. Glover, Choosing Children: Genes, Disability and Design (Oxford University Press, 2006)
S.S. Hall, Size Matters: How Height Affects the Health, Happiness, and Success of Boys – and the Men they Become (Houghton Mifflin, 2006)
J. Harris, Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People (Princeton University Press, 2007).
J. Hughes, Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future (Westview Press, 2004)
B. McKibben, Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age (Henry Holt, 2003)
E. Parens, “Authenticity and Ambivalence: Toward Understanding the Enhancement Debate,” Hastings Center Report 35, no. 3 (2005): 34-41.
M. Sandel,The Case Against Perfection(Harvard University Press, 2007)